masthead bottom rule
May 21, 2012
Complete Special Education Division study released

final report follows initial June 2010 release

The final report out of a comprehensive study of Capital Region BOCES' Special Education Division is now available, and can be downloaded here as a PDF.

 

The 16-page report is the result of a multi-month study conducted of the division by AdvisorySolutions, an affiliate of the New York State School Boards Association. The goal of the study was to learn how the BOCES organization might reverse declining enrollment in Special Education programs and position itself to grow and thrive into the future. AdvisorySolutions began its work in January 2010 and studied nine aspects of the division, including quality of classroom instruction, cost effectiveness and management structure. (See highlights below.) The executive summary of this report was released and presented to the Board of Education last spring.

 

“We thank AdvisorySolutions again for its hard work, in studying an immensely complex division in a relatively short period of time,” said District Superintendent Charles Dedrick. “We have started investigating and implementing some of the proposed changes, and will continue to study the report's findings throughout this school year. We thank AdvisorySolutions for being critical — this report gives us a solid roadmap for better serving our region's schools and students."

 

Highlights

The report includes observations and recommendations in nine areas, including:

arrow bulletType and quality of classroom and program supervision:

bulletObservation and review of classroom curriculum revealed that the quality of classroom instruction taking place is generally quite good.

bulletThe Annual Professional Performance Review is an excellent way to assess staff performance but its benefits aren't always realized because principals have so many staff to evaluate.

bulletA review of student schedules found the NYS Physical Education times aren't always being met for all students.

bulletIn some classrooms observed, there were more adults present than students.

arrow bulletCost effectiveness of services compared to similar programs (public and private) in the region:

bulletCurrent base classroom, itinerant and related services charges are comparable to the rates charged by comparable BOCES.

bulletThe number of social workers and classroom aide ratios is high.

bulletRecommendations include to increase classrooms in areas where waiting lists persist.

arrow bulletStaffing patterns and effectiveness:

bulletA review of individual student schedules suggest an overlap of providers and redundancy of providers in some classrooms.

bulletAll secondary teachers have received "high qualified" status.

bulletIncreased program coordination is sought by districts.

bulletRecommendations include revising classroom descriptions to allow for more flexible grouping of students.

arrow bulletInternal and external reporting and communication:

bulletCommunication is viewed by many staff members as top-down.

bulletDistricts feel there is no clear structure to facilitate communication between the division and components.

bulletRecommendations include updated training in IEP Direct (student information system) for all staff and increasing the visibility of the division director in component districts.

arrow bulletStructure of classroom site agreements:

bulletGeographic distribution of classroom is limited to the center of the Capital Region BOCES region.

bulletA lack of a system to project classroom needs and a lack of flexibility in location of classrooms has resulted in wait lists and placement recommendations whose locations aren't optimal.

bulletRecommendations include looking for alternative sites, and visiting each district prior to budget development to get an accurate sense of classroom/student needs.

arrow bulletStructure of the current management model:

bulletJob roles and functions are not clearly defined, resulting in redundancy in tasks and roles.

bulletThere is little evidence of long term strategic planning.

bulletRecommendations include a job analysis of all administrative and support staff functions, and identifying an administrator whose primary role is divisional leadership and systems change.

arrow bulletFiscal management techniques used to develop service costs:

bulletIn three comparative BOCES, the special education budget was developed with the business office; at Capital Region BOCES, special education develops its own budget and only meets periodically with the business office to review it.

bulletCapital Region BOCES bills monthly based on actual enrollment, similar to two of the other BOCES reviewed.

bulletRecommendations include special education and the business office developing the division budget jointly, and ensuring the tuition rate of each program is reflective of actual program costs.

arrow bulletInternal process related to invoicing districts:

bulletBills are generated, checked by principals, then sent to districts monthly.

bulletMaintenance of student files in IEP Direct (software) is weak.

bulletRecommendations include training all staff to use and maintain student records in IEP Direct and clarifying procedures for inputting new and existing student data in IEP Direct.

arrow bulletExternal factors affecting program enrollment:

bulletCapital Region BOCES' decrease in student enrollment is consistent with statewide enrollment trends, and a primary reason for that decrease is a trend toward having as many students as possible educated in their home schools.

bulletRecommendations include increasing communication with districts to be able to make yearly enrollment projections.

 

 

Next steps

BOCES is in the midst of forming four work groups that will further study the report and make concrete recommendations for change. Membership for these groups will include 10-12 individuals each from Special Education and other BOCES administration, teachers, teaching assistants, related service providers and support staff. Component district superintendents and Committee on Special Education (CSE) chairs are also being asked for their participation.

 

Membership of each work group, along with the charge/direction for each, will be publicized the last week in September. Individuals will be assigned to work groups based on expressed interest and areas of expertise. The groups will begin meeting in early October.

 

The workgroups will meet five to six times during the 2010-2011 school year and will report regularly on their progress and recommendations to a steering committee of central office staff (including Dedrick, Special Education Division Director Inge Jacobs and Assistant Superintendent for Technology and Innovation Carl Strang, who has been tapped to oversee the entire process), union representatives and BOCES board member Gary DiLallo.

 

The goal is that change recommended by the work groups will be implemented beginning in fall 2011.

 

"We look forward to all these groups beginning their work shortly," said Dedrick. "Staff input will be key to this process."

 

to top

Leaders for Educational Excellence motto graphic